Decision systems I built

4 min read

Decision systems I built

4 min read

Decision systems I built

Decision systems I built

1) POV

Enterprise work is full of stakeholders, constraints, and incomplete information. I use a lightweight decision loop to make trade-offs explicit, reduce risk, and keep teams moving. Below are a few decisions that show the system at work.

2) My decision loop

  1. Identify options

  2. Gather the right info

  3. Weigh the evidence

  4. Decide and act

  5. Review results

3) How I make decisions defensible

  • Decision sizing: I match rigor to impact and reversibility. Big bets get deeper comparison and risk work. Small calls move fast.

  • Trade-offs: We state what we’re optimizing and what we’re accepting, then design mitigations instead of hiding compromises.

  • Pre-mortem: We assume the decision fails and ask why, then build guardrails and fallback paths upfront.



4) Proof in practice

Micro-decision 1: Plug-and-play wedge vs standalone CLM suite

[DOODLE ICON IMAGE to insert here]
Concept: door wedge / ramp (single-line).

One-line summary: We chose a workflow-native CLM wedge first, then expanded toward a fuller suite as foundations matured.

  • Options: Standalone end-to-end CLM suite vs workflow-native plug-and-play wedge vs hybrid phased approach

  • Signals: A suite-first experience would be slower to validate and expensive to reach “enterprise complete” parity early.

  • Trade-off: Faster time-to-value and adoption confidence over suite completeness in the first release.

  • Decision: Build the lifecycle backbone and workflow-native experience first, then grow surface area based on evidence.

  • Result: We shipped a credible starting point sooner without painting ourselves into a corner on long-term product direction.

  • Pre-mortem: Risk: wedge feels incomplete → Mitigation: define “MVP complete,” communicate what’s deferred, and ship a phased roadmap tied to real friction signals.

  • Deprioritized: A broad “everything in one place” CLM suite UX in v1.


CLM wedge vs full suite

Chosen: Workflow-native backbone first
Trade-off: Speed and adoption over suite completeness
Pre-mortem: Feels incomplete → define “MVP complete” + phased roadmap
Deprioritized: Full standalone suite UX in v1

[DOODLE ICON for this card]
Concept: door wedge or ramp (simple single-line doodle).


Final design for the MVP version

After the ideation phase, ideas are typically evaluated and refined. Some ideas may be combined or adapted, while others may be set aside. Evaluation criteria can include feasibility, impact, and alignment with project goals.

Contents

Role

UX & UI

Branding

Product Strategy

Website Development

Team

Duration and date

2 Months

December - November 2023

Role

UX & UI

Branding

Product Strategy

Website Development

Team

Duration and date

2 Months

December - November 2023